Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data & AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma & Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Issues / 2022 / Oct / Losing (Cognitive) Control
Spectroscopy

Losing (Cognitive) Control

High-demand cognitive work causes a build up of glutamate in the brain – according to real-time magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis – which, in turn, may alter economic decision making

By Georgia Hulme 10/03/2022 1 min read

Share

Mental fatigue has long puzzled scientists. Why do we feel it? What generates it? These questions nagged researchers from Pitié-Salpêtrière University in Paris, France, as they contemplated why machines can do cognitive tasks continuously without fatigue but the brain cannot. They hypothesized that fatigue arises from an increase in the cost of exerting cognitive control – which stems from glutamate accumulation in the brain (1).

To test this theory, two groups of participants executed either high- or low-demand cognitive tasks, interlaced with economic decisions, while researchers measured the levels of metabolites in their brains. The researchers found that, when intense cognitive work is prolonged for several hours, some potentially toxic byproducts of neural activity, such as glutamate, accumulate in the prefrontal cortex. “This alters the control over decisions, which are shifted towards low-cost actions (no effort, no wait) as cognitive fatigue emerges,” explains Antonius Wiehler, co-author of the paper. Other signs of fatigue in the group performing mentally challenging tasks included pupil dilation and increased levels of glutamate in the synapses of the inferior prefrontal cortex.
 

In previous studies, the researchers used fMRI – but this technique could not explain why the cost of cognitive control increases over time. Instead, the team used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which meant that they could measure brain metabolites while human subjects carried out the tasks.

Although the study had minor limitations – such as the low spatial and temporal resolution of MRS – and the results were only correlational, they do offer an explanation as to why cognitive control is harder to mobilize after a strenuous workday. Wiehler hopes that, in the future, “prefrontal metabolites could be monitored using MRS to detect cases of severe fatigue/burnout in many different situations, such as employees after work, athletes during heavy training programs, or students during revisions before their exams.”

In further studies, the researchers hope to learn why the prefrontal cortex is more susceptible to fatigue and glutamate accumulation than other brain regions. Wiehler seeks to understand how metabolite buildup could be prevented or removed from the synapses. He adds, “Going forward, we may also be exploring whether markers of fatigue are predictive of clinical outcome across diseases such as cancer or depression.”

Newsletters

Receive the latest analytical science news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

References

  1. A Wiehler et al., Current Biology, 32, 1 (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.010.

About the Author(s)

Georgia Hulme

Georgia Hulme is Associate Editor at The Analytical Scientist

More Articles by Georgia Hulme

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.