Conexiant
Login
  • The Analytical Scientist
  • The Cannabis Scientist
  • The Medicine Maker
  • The Ophthalmologist
  • The Pathologist
  • The Traditional Scientist
The Analytical Scientist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • News & Research
    • Trends & Challenges
    • Keynote Interviews
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Product Profiles
    • App Notes

    Featured Topics

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Topics

    Techniques & Tools

    • Mass Spectrometry
    • Chromatography
    • Spectroscopy
    • Microscopy
    • Sensors
    • Data & AI

    • View All Topics

    Applications & Fields

    • Clinical
    • Environmental
    • Food, Beverage & Agriculture
    • Pharma & Biopharma
    • Omics
    • Forensics
  • People & Profiles

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Sitting Down With
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Business & Education

    Business & Education

    • Innovation
    • Business & Entrepreneurship
    • Career Pathways
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

The Analytical Scientist / Power List / 2015 / The Top 100 Most Influential People / Barry Karger

Barry Karger

Director, Barnett Institute; Distinguished Professor andJames L. Waters Chair in Analytical Chemistry, Northeastern University, Massachusetts, USA.

  • Profile

Meet Barry Karger

Most important lesson There are many lessons learned, but perhaps the most important is that science continually changes, and we have to change with it. We can’t be afraid of going in new directions, in fact, that prevents us from getting bored.

Most unexpected outcome In the Human Genome Project, Molecular Dynamics used a linear polyacrylamide polymer we developed for sequencing by CE. They designed the instrument with a maximum column temperature of 43 °C, which was unfortunate; they could have sequenced 200-300 more bases per run at 70 °C. It’s an example of where (not) understanding the fundamentals of a process can have a major effect.

Eye on the horizon It is remarkable how different the field of analytical chemistry is today over when I began in the 1960s. At that time, analytical chemistry was being dropped at top schools and the prestige of the field was low. Today is just the opposite, and all fields recognize the major importance of analytical chemistry. For the life sciences, the need for new and improved tools has never been more striking. In one example, we are entering a new era in protein characterization where analysis of the intact molecule is rapidly being developed. The need for high-resolution separation, mass spectrometry, and data processing/analysis is great. And note that it is the molecules that control biological function, not the component parts (peptides).

Sitting Down With interview: tas.txp.to/1015/Karger

Newsletters

Receive the latest pathology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

Recommended

False

False

The Analytical Scientist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.